· In medicine, authors are expected to have made contributions to both the research work and the writing of the paper, and also to accept responsibility for properly investigating mistakes (ICMJE guidelines). I think the same should apply to CS research papers: authors should have made substantial contributions to the novel ideas and/or evaluation of these ideas; authors should have helped write or revise the paper; and authors should accept responsibility for mistakes in this work If you are a named co-author, this means that you. Made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that’s Affiliations: get it right. Your affiliation in the manuscript should be the institution where you conducted the Changes. After the journal has accepted your article, if If you are first author or corresponding author you will share 60 % of total impact of the paper. It depend if first author is corresponding author then 60 %, If both are different then this is
Authorship: Difference Between "Contributor" and "Co-Author" - Enago Academy
I recently discovered that someone had put my name on a conference submission without first asking my permission. This is inappropriate, and I asked that my name be talken off the submission. Please do not add me as a co-author on co author in research paper paper without getting my permission first. I realise your intentions were good, but you need to ask first!
I also expect to see a draft of the paper in question. In general, when I am asked to be a co-author on a paper, co author in research paper, I look at scientific quality and my level of contribution, and sometimes to a lesser extent at scientific impact. Scientific papers need to be factually correct, with good evaluation and awareness of previous work; papers based on ML need to use appropriate training data. From my personal perspective, I do not want my name on a paper which does not meet the above criteria.
In your case, you based your evaluation purely on metrics such as BLEU. I do not believe that this is a good way of evaluating NLG systems and have recently written a paper about this, as well as many blog postsand I will not be a co-author on such a paper unless there are clearly-stated sound reasons for doing a metric-only evaluation which was not the case in your paper. Paper authors should have made a substantial contribution to the work described in the paper.
In medicine, authors are expected to have made contributions to both the research work and the writing of the paper, and also to accept responsibility for properly investigating mistakes ICMJE guidelines.
In your case, we had a good face-to-face discussion about your research, co author in research paper, and also exchanged some emails. I hope this helped you; certainly I try to be helpful when people ask for my advice on their research. However, I do not consider this level of involvement to co author in research paper sufficient to warrant being a co-author. When I am the first or primary author of a paper, I only submit it if I think it will have a real scientific impact. When I am asked to be a co-author, this is less of a concern since other people are doing most of the writingbut I still want to see that the main author is excited about the work.
Which of course is true for you co author in research paper your paper! I also appreciate that junior researchers who are trying to establish themselves may need to be less choosy than established researchers such as myself, co author in research paper. In very crude terms, I think a paper is useful from a CV perspective if it has the potential to increase your h-index.
Which means that a paper which gets 10 citations will be useful to your CV but not to mine, co author in research paper. Although I do not wish to be a co-author on your paper as it currently stands, I am happy to keep on discussing your research with you, and making suggestions as to how to improve it.
Perhaps at some point in the future this will lead to a proper collaboration and hence co-authorship. But in the meantime, if you think my comments are helpful, just thank me in your Acknowledgements section. It was very nice to hear that academics like you exist in this world. Unfortunately, there are some who would want to be listed as co-authors for just mere proof-reading or not even that!
Like Like. You are commenting using your WordPress. com account. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Skip to content Menu Home Blog Index About What is NLG Publications Resources University Contact, co author in research paper.
Dear XXX Please do not add me as a co-author on a paper without getting my permission first. Scientific Quality Scientific papers need to be factually correct, with good evaluation and awareness of previous work; papers based on ML need to use appropriate training data.
My Contribution Paper authors should have made a substantial contribution to the work described in the paper. Scientific Impact When I am the first or primary author of a paper, I only submit it if Co author in research paper think it will have a real scientific impact. Final Comments Although I do not wish to be a co-author on your paper as it currently stands, I am happy to keep on discussing your research with you, and making suggestions as to how to improve it.
Best wishes Ehud Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Share this: Twitter Facebook. Previous Post How Would I Automatically Evaluate NLG Systems? Next Post Use Co author in research paper Baselines!
Pingback: Please check the boring details in your paper! Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. LinkedIn Twitter.
Authors: Manuscript Submission, Editorial Manager
, time: 12:38Why I do not Want to be a Co-author on Your Paper – Ehud Reiter's Blog
CO-AUTHORSHIP, OR MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP, of journal articles has long been a feature of academic scholarship. It has however been a more frequent product of research activities in science, technology, and medicine (STM); such as the output of scientists working together in the same blogger.com Size: 1MB · A co-author blocks the publication of a paper because he/she does not agree with their co-authors' revisions. Such revisions might include those made prior to submission or those made in response to reviewers' comments. Or a co-author feels that they have not had adequate opportunity to provide input into the revision process I personally think that the supervisors should be allowed to be a co-author of the research paper, as the work has been carried out under the able guidance and supervision of the guide. Besides
No comments:
Post a Comment